[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11141] trunk/harbour

[Szakáts Viktor]

>> My question is whether to rename__AXGETCONTROL() to
>> WIN_AXATLGETCONTROL() ? Is this such a function which
>> users will want to (and can safely) use in their final apps?
>> If the return value is an obscure one, useful only for AX extensions
>> dealing with internals, I think we should keep the internal name.
>
> In current code:
> 1) __AXGETCONTROL(), __OLECREATEOBJECT() and __OLEGETOBJECT() return  
> collectible IDispatch pointer;
> 2) WIN_AxGetControl(), WIN_OleCreateObject() and  
> WIN_OleGetActiveObject() return object.
>
> So, it would be nice to have a compatible naming scheme for OLE and  
> AX. If you feel, you gonna use __AXGETOBJECT() in final  
> applications, feel free to rename.

Me definitely not. I stay away from ActiveX, it was rather a
generic question. But I understand perfectly what you mean,
and I agree with your concept.

I've already committed accordingly.

Brgds,
Viktor